Comparison

Centrifugal vs. Masticating Juicers Explained

By James Chen • January 2, 2026 • 10 min read

When shopping for a juicer, you'll quickly encounter two primary categories: centrifugal and masticating. These terms describe fundamentally different approaches to extracting juice from produce, each with distinct advantages and trade-offs. Understanding these differences is essential for choosing a juicer that matches your priorities, whether that's speed, juice quality, versatility, or budget.

As someone who has tested dozens of models across both categories, I'll break down exactly how each type works, compare their performance across key metrics, and help you determine which is the better choice for your specific situation.

How Centrifugal Juicers Work

Centrifugal juicers use a fast-spinning blade disc with tiny teeth that shreds produce as it enters the machine. This disc typically rotates at speeds between 6,000 and 14,000 RPM (revolutions per minute), depending on the model and speed setting.

As produce is pulverised by the spinning blade, the resulting pulp is flung outward against a mesh filter basket by centrifugal force—the same principle that makes water fly off a spinning disc. Juice passes through the fine mesh while pulp collects on the basket walls, eventually being expelled into a separate container.

The entire extraction process happens almost instantaneously. You feed an apple into the chute, and juice appears in your glass within seconds. This speed is one of the primary appeals of centrifugal juicers.

How Masticating Juicers Work

Masticating juicers (also called slow juicers or cold-press juicers) take a completely different approach. Instead of high-speed shredding, they use a slowly rotating auger—a screw-shaped mechanism—to crush and squeeze produce against a chamber wall or screen.

The auger typically rotates at just 40 to 100 RPM, roughly one hundred times slower than centrifugal juicers. This slow crushing action breaks down produce cell walls thoroughly, releasing juice that's then separated from pulp through a fine mesh screen.

The slower speed means the extraction process takes longer, but the gentle pressing action generates minimal heat and introduces less oxygen into the juice. Masticating juicers come in two main configurations: vertical models that are more compact and horizontal models that often offer additional functionality like nut butter making.

💡 The "Cold-Press" Question

While masticating juicers are often marketed as "cold-press," this term can be misleading. True cold-press juicing involves hydraulic press machines used commercially. Masticating juicers do generate less heat than centrifugal models, but "slow juicer" is a more accurate descriptor.

Speed and Convenience

For time-conscious juicers, speed matters significantly. Here's how the two types compare in practical daily use.

Centrifugal Advantage

Centrifugal juicers excel at speed. The combination of high-speed extraction and typically wider feed chutes means you can produce a large glass of juice in under a minute, often with minimal produce preparation. Some models accept whole apples and large carrot pieces without cutting.

This speed advantage makes centrifugal juicers ideal for busy mornings when every minute counts. The difference is substantial: what takes 60 seconds on a centrifugal model might take 4-5 minutes on a masticating juicer.

Masticating Consideration

Masticating juicers require more time, both for preparation (smaller feed chutes require cutting produce into smaller pieces) and for the extraction itself. However, many users find the slower pace becomes a meditative morning ritual rather than a chore, and the time difference becomes less significant as you develop an efficient routine.

Juice Quality and Nutrition

Perhaps the most debated aspect of the centrifugal versus masticating discussion involves juice quality and nutritional content.

Oxidation and Heat

The high-speed spinning action of centrifugal juicers introduces more air into the juice and generates friction heat. Both factors accelerate oxidation, which degrades certain nutrients (particularly vitamin C and some enzymes) and can cause juice to separate and change colour more quickly.

Masticating juicers' slower action minimises both heat and air incorporation, resulting in juice that theoretically retains more nutrients and stays fresh longer. Independent testing has confirmed higher antioxidant levels and enzyme activity in juice from masticating models.

Practical Significance

However, the real-world significance of these differences depends on how you consume your juice. If you drink it immediately—as most nutritionists recommend—the oxidation advantage of masticating juicers is less relevant. The differences become more significant if you're batch-preparing juice for later consumption.

Key Takeaway

Both juicer types produce nutritious juice. The masticating advantage is most significant for juice stored beyond 30 minutes. For immediate consumption, both types deliver excellent nutritional value.

Juice Yield Comparison

The amount of juice extracted from the same quantity of produce varies between juicer types, affecting both nutrition and cost over time.

General Performance

Masticating juicers typically produce 15-30% more juice from the same produce compared to centrifugal models. The slower, more thorough crushing action extracts liquid more completely, leaving noticeably drier pulp.

This higher yield compounds over time. If you juice daily, the additional produce required by a centrifugal juicer adds significant cost over months and years—potentially offsetting the higher initial cost of a masticating model.

Specific Produce Differences

The yield gap is particularly pronounced with:

Centrifugal juicers perform relatively better with hard, water-rich produce like apples, carrots, and cucumbers, where the yield gap narrows considerably.

Noise Levels

If you juice early in the morning or have a noise-sensitive household, this factor deserves serious consideration.

Centrifugal: Loud

There's no gentle way to say it: centrifugal juicers are loud. The high-speed motor and spinning blade create significant noise, typically in the 80-90 decibel range—comparable to a blender or vacuum cleaner. Early morning juicing will wake sleeping family members in adjacent rooms.

Masticating: Quiet

Masticating juicers operate at a fraction of the noise level, typically 40-60 decibels—more like a quiet conversation. You can hold a normal conversation while a masticating juicer runs, and early morning operation is much less disruptive.

Versatility Beyond Juicing

Many masticating juicers offer functionality that extends beyond juice extraction, adding value for users who might otherwise purchase separate appliances.

Masticating Capabilities

Common additional functions include:

Centrifugal Limitations

Centrifugal juicers are typically single-purpose machines designed specifically for juice extraction. Their high-speed operation doesn't translate to the other applications that masticating models handle.

🔧 Horizontal vs. Vertical Masticating

Horizontal masticating juicers generally offer more versatility (nut butter, pasta, etc.) but take up more counter space. Vertical models are more compact and often faster to use, but may have fewer additional functions. Consider which format suits your kitchen and intended uses.

Price Comparison

Budget plays a significant role in most purchasing decisions, and there's a notable price difference between the two categories.

Centrifugal Range

Entry-level centrifugal juicers start around $50-80 AUD, with mid-range models from established brands like Breville running $150-350 AUD. Premium centrifugal juicers rarely exceed $400 AUD.

Masticating Range

Budget masticating juicers begin around $150-200 AUD, with quality mid-range options from $300-500 AUD. Premium masticating models, including twin-gear designs, can reach $800-1,200 AUD or more.

Total Cost of Ownership

Remember that the higher yield of masticating juicers reduces ongoing produce costs. Over several years of daily juicing, produce savings can offset much of the higher initial investment.

Cleaning and Maintenance

Daily cleaning is an unavoidable reality of juicing, so ease of cleaning significantly impacts long-term satisfaction.

Centrifugal: Generally have more parts and the mesh filter basket with its fine perforations requires careful cleaning. Some models feature dishwasher-safe parts, simplifying the process.

Masticating: Typically have fewer parts and the auger design can be easier to clean thoroughly. However, the fine mesh screen still requires attention. Many users find masticating juicers somewhat easier to clean overall.

Making Your Decision

After considering all factors, here's guidance for different user profiles:

Choose centrifugal if: Speed is your top priority, you primarily juice hard fruits and vegetables, you're on a tight budget, or you're testing whether juicing fits your lifestyle before investing more.

Choose masticating if: Juice quality and nutrient retention are paramount, you frequently juice leafy greens, you want versatility beyond juicing, you batch-prep juice for later, or you need quiet operation.

Neither type is objectively "better"—they serve different priorities. The best juicer is one that matches your specific needs and that you'll actually use consistently. Consider your morning routine, the produce you plan to juice most often, and which factors matter most to your lifestyle.

JC

James Chen

Technical Editor

James is a mechanical engineer turned juicing enthusiast who brings his technical expertise to every article. He specialises in breaking down complex specifications and helping readers understand the engineering behind their kitchen appliances.